Thames v. State
This text of 769 So. 2d 448 (Thames v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oliver THAMES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he argues that his sentence is illegal because the trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over his case in violation of Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of our recent opinion in Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
769 So. 2d 448, 2000 WL 1421355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thames-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.