Vangunda v. State
769 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2000 WL 1421445
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2000·No. No. 1D00-647·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This appeal arises from an order summarily denying Appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant concedes that the trial court’s denial of claim 1 was proper. Claim 2 is without merit. Therefore, we affirm claims 1 and 2 without further discussion. We remand claim 3 to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vangunda v. State, 769 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2000 WL 1421445 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
769 So. 2d 448 (Vangunda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thames v. State
769 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)