Vangunda v. State

769 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2000 WL 1421445
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 2000
DocketNo. 1D00-647
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 769 So. 2d 448 (Vangunda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vangunda v. State, 769 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2000 WL 1421445 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an order summarily denying Appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant concedes that the trial court’s denial of claim 1 was proper. Claim 2 is without merit. Therefore, we affirm claims 1 and 2 without further discussion. We remand claim 3 to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thames v. State
769 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
769 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372, 2000 WL 1421445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vangunda-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.