Bradford v. State

898 So. 2d 1210, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227, 2005 WL 856138
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 2005
DocketNo. 2D05-180
StatusPublished

This text of 898 So. 2d 1210 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradford v. State, 898 So. 2d 1210, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227, 2005 WL 856138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc), review granted, 889 So.2d 72 (Fla.2004). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and [1211]*1211Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacIas v. State
614 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hampton v. State
764 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Hernandez v. State
825 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bingham v. State
813 So. 2d 1021 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wright v. State
864 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Thames v. State
769 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Kirtsey v. State
855 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 So. 2d 1210, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227, 2005 WL 856138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.