Bradford v. State
898 So. 2d 1210, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227, 2005 WL 856138
Opinion
Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc), review granted, 889 So.2d 72 (Fla.2004). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and [1211] Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradford v. State, 898 So. 2d 1210, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227, 2005 WL 856138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
898 So. 2d 1210 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacIas v. State
614 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hampton v. State
764 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Hernandez v. State
825 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bingham v. State
813 So. 2d 1021 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wright v. State
864 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Thames v. State
769 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Kirtsey v. State
855 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)