Texas Electric Railway Co. v. Eastus
308 U.S. 512, 60 S. Ct. 134, 84 L. Ed. 437, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 694, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1116
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 6, 1939
DocketNo. 31
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases
This text of 308 U.S. 512 (Texas Electric Railway Co. v. Eastus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Texas Electric Railway Co. v. Eastus, 308 U.S. 512, 60 S. Ct. 134, 84 L. Ed. 437, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 694, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1116 (1939).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed. Shields v. Utah Idaho Central R. Co., 305 U. S. 177; Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Railway Labor Executives' Association and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
859 F.2d 996 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission
718 F.2d 533 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Michigan National Bank v. Department of Treasury
127 Mich. App. 646 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
Mich. Nat'l Bk. v. Treasury Dep't
339 N.W.2d 515 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
ATL, Inc. v. United States
31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,347 (Court of Claims, 1983)
United States v. Houston H. Feaster, Individually and as Director, Alabama State Docksdepartment
376 F.2d 147 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
Central Transportation Company v. Atkins
305 S.W.2d 940 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1957)
United States v. Norris Looney, Doing Business as the Norris Looney Company
226 F.2d 144 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)
Meyer v. State Board of Equalization
267 P.2d 257 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Wildermuth v. United States
195 F.2d 18 (Seventh Circuit, 1952)
United States v. Foster Transfer Co.
183 F.2d 494 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
Mitchell Canneries, Inc. v. United States
77 F. Supp. 498 (Court of Claims, 1948)
Evans Electrical Const. Co. v. Wm. S. Lozier, Inc.
68 F. Supp. 256 (W.D. Missouri, 1946)
Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.
64 F. Supp. 200 (D. Nebraska, 1946)
Public Service Com'n of New York v. United States
56 F. Supp. 351 (S.D. New York, 1944)
Trotwood Trailers, Inc. v. Evatt
51 N.E.2d 645 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)
Reed v. Chicago, N. S. & M. R.
131 F.2d 458 (Seventh Circuit, 1942)
State v. Woods
5 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
English Const. Co. v. United States
43 F. Supp. 313 (D. Delaware, 1942)
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Johnson
119 P.2d 945 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
308 U.S. 512, 60 S. Ct. 134, 84 L. Ed. 437, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 694, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-electric-railway-co-v-eastus-scotus-1939.