Tettamble v. Missouri
386 U.S. 265, 18 L. Ed. 2d 42
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in jornia pauperis and the petition for- a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration in light of Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tettamble v. Missouri, 386 U.S. 265, 18 L. Ed. 2d 42 (1967).
386 U.S. 265 (Tettamble v. Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sederquist v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
652 F. Supp. 341 (D. Nevada, 1987)
State v. White
621 S.W.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1981)
State v. Sager
600 S.W.2d 541 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Morris
564 S.W.2d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Pitchford
556 S.W.2d 57 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Madison
557 S.W.2d 8 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Tettamble
517 S.W.2d 732 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
State v. Tettamble
450 S.W.2d 191 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary v. William B. Donnell
382 F.2d 248 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
Hudgins v. California
386 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1967)