Hudgins v. California

386 U.S. 265, 87 S. Ct. 1035
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 13, 1967
Docket37, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 386 U.S. 265 (Hudgins v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudgins v. California, 386 U.S. 265, 87 S. Ct. 1035 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied because the petition was not timely filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ramirez
40 Cal. App. 3d 347 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
People v. Hudgins
252 Cal. App. 2d 174 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Tettamble v. Missouri
386 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 U.S. 265, 87 S. Ct. 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudgins-v-california-scotus-1967.