Hudgins v. California

386 U.S. 265, 87 S. Ct. 1035
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 37, Misc·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied because the petition was not timely filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudgins v. California, 386 U.S. 265, 87 S. Ct. 1035 (1967).

386 U.S. 265 (Hudgins v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramirez
40 Cal. App. 3d 347 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
People v. Hudgins
252 Cal. App. 2d 174 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Tettamble v. Missouri
386 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1967)