State v. White
This text of 619 S.W.2d 79 (State v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Reexamination on order of the United States Supreme Court
This case together with several others 1 was ordered reexamined in light of Alber[80]*80naz v. United States, 450 U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981). Since all of the courts of appeals rulings were based upon our ruling in Sours v. State, 593 S.W.2d 208 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours I) or Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours II), the cases were all ordered transferred to this Court. Our examination of the double jeopardy issue made in light of Albernaz pursuant to the orders of the United States Supreme Court, appears in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc No. 62227), decided July 14, 1981.
The original opinion filed by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, State v. White, 610 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App.1980), is approved and affirmed and by reference made a part of this opinion. Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours II), cert. denied, Missouri v. Sours, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 953, 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); and State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc 1981).
The conviction and judgment is reversed outright with respect to Count III, armed criminal action. The conviction and judgment in Count I, robbery first degree, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
619 S.W.2d 79, 1981 Mo. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-white-mo-1981.