Teresa Toombs, of the Estate of Ozella Huling v. Hospital Authority of Columbus, Georgia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
DocketA18A0005
StatusPublished

This text of Teresa Toombs, of the Estate of Ozella Huling v. Hospital Authority of Columbus, Georgia (Teresa Toombs, of the Estate of Ozella Huling v. Hospital Authority of Columbus, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teresa Toombs, of the Estate of Ozella Huling v. Hospital Authority of Columbus, Georgia, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 17, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0005. TERESA TOOMBS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF OZELLA HULING v. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA et al.

In this civil action, plaintiff Teresa Toombs, Executrix of the Estate of Ozella Huling, filed this direct appeal, seeking review of the trial court’s order denying Toombs’s “Motion for Reconsideration and for Rehearing Regarding Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.” We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, the trial court’s order is not final. In the order that Toombs seeks to appeal, the trial court did not grant summary judgment to any of the parties to this case. Rather, the court merely (i) denied Toombs’s request for a “rehearing” on the ground that no summary judgment hearing had yet been held; and (ii) granted one defendant’s request for attorney fees under an unidentified statute.1 Consequently, because this action remains pending below, Toombs was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal the order at issue here. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). Toombs’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Second, even if Toombs had a right of direct appeal here, this appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the trial court

1 Although also styled as a motion for “reconsideration,” Toombs’s motion identified no rulings as to which she sought reconsideration, and the trial court therefore neither granted nor denied such relief. order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012). Toombs’s May 19, 2017 notice of appeal is untimely, as it was filed 46 days after entry of the trial court’s order on April 3, 2017. For each of the above reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/17/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Boyd v. State
383 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Perlman v. Perlman
734 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Teresa Toombs, of the Estate of Ozella Huling v. Hospital Authority of Columbus, Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teresa-toombs-of-the-estate-of-ozella-huling-v-hospital-authority-of-gactapp-2017.