Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. Kevin Chappell
This text of Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. Kevin Chappell (Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. Kevin Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAR 26 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TEOFILO MEDINA, Jr., No. 09-99015
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:94-CV-01892-RSWL Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, ORDER Respondent - Appellee.
TEOFILO MEDINA, Jr., No. 09-99016
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:97-CV-07062-RSWL Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
R. K. WONG,
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge and WARDLAW and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
We sent the accompanying opinion for filing on Friday, March 20, 2015.
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, we received from Mr. Medina’s counsel a filing
entitled “Suggestion of Death” informing us of a press release indicating that Mr.
Medina had “died on the evening of March 22, 2015 from natural causes . . . .” Because at all times when we made our decision and sent it for filing, the case was
not moot, we allowed it to be published in the ordinary course. However, we direct
the parties to file letter briefs within 14 days hereof addressing how best to proceed
with the opinion in light of Mr. Medina’s death.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. Kevin Chappell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teofilo-medina-jr-v-kevin-chappell-ca9-2015.