Tennessee-Arkansas Gravel Co. v. Harvey

151 So. 133
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 1, 1933
DocketNo. 4515.
StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 133 (Tennessee-Arkansas Gravel Co. v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tennessee-Arkansas Gravel Co. v. Harvey, 151 So. 133 (La. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

On application of plaintiff, and on its showing that we committed an error in our former judgment herein, this rehearing was granted. 147 So. 739. It was restricted solely to the question of attorney’s fees claimed by plaintiff. We held that these fees were not authorized by law, that is, that a road contractor could not be penalized by condemning him to pay the fees of the attorney of a suing creditor simply because he did not, or could not, pay his debts. In this we were in error. Such fees are authorized by section 8 of Act *134 No. 224 of 1918, and were awarded in State v. Smith, 167 La. 301, 119 So. 56; State v. Miller, 169 La. 914, 126 So. 422.

The lower court allowed these fees. For the reasons assigned, our former decree herein is amended by affirming the judgment appealed from in the respect that it allowed plaintiff 10 per cent, attorney’s fees, and, as amended, our said decree is hereby reinstated and made the final judgment of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
119 So. 56 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Tennessee-Arkansas Grvl v. Harvey Jones
147 So. 739 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
State v. Miller
126 So. 422 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennessee-arkansas-gravel-co-v-harvey-lactapp-1933.