Taylor v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 307, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 443
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Cust. Ct. 461
United States Customs Court·Decided November 1, 1950·No. No. 54818; protest 150235-K/13045 (New Orleans)·Published

Opinion

[308]*308Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated tha,t the issues and fasts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. D. 352) and that the merchandise contained in cases 6 and 760, reported by the inspector as manifested and landed empty, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that the portions of the merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested and landed empty are subject to an allowance in duties and internal revenue tax. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 307, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 443 (cusc 1950).

25 Cust. Ct. 307 (Taylor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.