Taylor v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 264, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1406
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1949
DocketNo. 52944; protest 122261-K (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 264 (Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 264, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1406 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Cust. Ct. 264, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-united-states-cusc-1949.