Taylor v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 334, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Cust. Ct. 461
United States Customs Court·Decided June 3, 1949·No. No. 53226; protests 112489-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 334, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1688 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 334 (Taylor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)