Taylor v. Switzer

19 S.W. 735, 110 Mo. 410, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 88
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJune 6, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 19 S.W. 735 (Taylor v. Switzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Switzer, 19 S.W. 735, 110 Mo. 410, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 88 (Mo. 1892).

Opinion

Brace, J.

This is an action in ejectment for the recovery of a tract of land in Bates county.

On the trial the court refused to permit a sheriff’s deed to the land in question to be read in evidence, on the defendant’s objection thereto. The plaintiffs thereupon took a nonsuit with leave, and in due time filed a motion to set the nonsuit aside, which motion, after-wards coming on to be heard, was overruled. Thereupon, without taking or saving any exceptions to the-ruling of the court on the motion, the' plaintiffs appealed. In which state of the record there being' nothing for this court to review, the judgment will be affirmed. City of St. Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345; State ex rel. v. Hitchcock, 86 Mo. 231.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hanson
132 S.W. 245 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Wabash Railroad v. Bowring
103 Mo. App. 158 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Smith v. Safety Fund Insurance Society
74 S.W. 168 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Bates v. Ruth & Mengal Realty Co.
88 Mo. App. 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Wentzville Tobacco Co. v. Walker
27 S.W. 639 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.
27 S.W. 715 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 S.W. 735, 110 Mo. 410, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-switzer-mo-1892.