Wilson v. Haxby

Supreme Court of Missouri

Wilson v. Haxby

76 Mo. 345

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Norton, J.

The record in this case does not show that any exception was taken either to the action of the trial court in overruling plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial or motion in arrest of judgment, and no error appearing [346]*346in the record proper, under the authority of the following cases the judgment must, be and is hereby affirmed. City of St. Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Case v. Fogg, 46 Mo. 44; Harrison v. Bartlett, 51 Mo. 170; Dougherty v. Whitehead, 31 Mo. 255.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton, J.

The record in this case does not show that any exception was taken either to the action of the trial court in overruling plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial or motion in arrest of judgment, and no error appearing [346]*346in the record proper, under the authority of the following cases the judgment must, be and is hereby affirmed. City of St. Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Case v. Fogg, 46 Mo. 44; Harrison v. Bartlett, 51 Mo. 170; Dougherty v. Whitehead, 31 Mo. 255.

All concur.

Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345 (Mo. 1882).

Pincite

76 Mo. 345 (Wilson v. Haxby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related