State ex rel. Dopkins v. Hitchcock
86 Mo. 231
Opinion
— This cause is before us on writ of error prosecuted by plaintiff from a judgment of the Harrison county circuit court, rendered in favor of defendants. The record fails to show that any exceptions were taken to the action of the court in overruling the motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial, and finding no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed. St. Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Dopkins v. Hitchcock, 86 Mo. 231 (Mo. 1885).
86 Mo. 231 (State ex rel. Dopkins v. Hitchcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. Moss
167 S.W. 523 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
State v. Swan
136 S.W. 711 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Wilbrandt v. Laclede Gas Light Co.
115 S.W. 497 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
State v. Libby
102 S.W. 641 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
Carter v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co.
102 S.W. 6 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Walter v. Scofield
67 S.W. 276 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Bates v. Ruth & Mengal Realty Co.
88 Mo. App. 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Browne v. Appleman
83 Mo. App. 79 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
Abbott v. Gillum
47 S.W. 1067 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Ross v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad
42 S.W. 957 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
State v. Murray
29 S.W. 590 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Taylor v. Switzer
19 S.W. 735 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Story & Camp v. Ragsdale
30 Mo. App. 196 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1888)