Taylor v. State
Opinion
ORDER
■ Brian Taylor appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record-on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed [848]*848facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
500 S.W.3d 847 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.