Taylor v. State

500 S.W.3d 847, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 613, 2016 WL 3418521
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 845
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2016·No. No. ED 103214·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Brian Taylor appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record-on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed [848]*848facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 500 S.W.3d 847, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 613, 2016 WL 3418521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

500 S.W.3d 847 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.