Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Taylor v. State

487 S.W.3d 512, 2016 WL 1640912, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 413

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2016·No. WD 78069·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Deonta R, Taylor appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of armed criminal action. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Deonta R, Taylor appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of armed criminal action. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Taylor v. State, 487 S.W.3d 512, 2016 WL 1640912, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

487 S.W.3d 512 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.