Taylor v. State

447 S.W.3d 736, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 910, 2014 WL 4193432
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100118·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kent Taylor (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment on Movant’s amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment or Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and'the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 447 S.W.3d 736, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 910, 2014 WL 4193432 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

447 S.W.3d 736 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.