Taylor v. State

383 S.W.3d 492, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414, 2012 WL 5493299

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2012·No. No. ED 97799·Published

Opinion

[493]*493ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Demetrius Taylor, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[493]*493ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Taylor v. State, 383 S.W.3d 492, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414, 2012 WL 5493299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

383 S.W.3d 492 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.