Taylor v. State

389 S.W.3d 748, 2013 WL 216374, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 70
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. ED 97759·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Terrance Darnell Taylor, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

[749]*749We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 389 S.W.3d 748, 2013 WL 216374, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 70 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

389 S.W.3d 748 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.