Taylor v. State
24 S.W.3d 737, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2000 WL 108615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1262 →
Opinion
ORDER
Ronald Taylor (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 24 S.W.3d 737, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2000 WL 108615 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
24 S.W.3d 737 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.