Taylor v. State
986 S.W.2d 922, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2099, 1998 WL 810150
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1262 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant Craig D. Taylor appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 986 S.W.2d 922, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2099, 1998 WL 810150 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
986 S.W.2d 922 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.