Taylor v. State
950 S.W.2d 326, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1519, 1997 WL 523891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1262 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 950 S.W.2d 326, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1519, 1997 WL 523891 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
950 S.W.2d 326 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.