Taylor v. State
524 So. 2d 719, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1079, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1988 WL 43400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 773 →
Opinion
Because appellant has stated that the only issue to be raised in this appeal is whether the sentence imposed is an illegal departure from the recommended sentence under the guidelines, and because the state acknowledges that appellant’s sentence is an improper sentence in excess of the guidelines, appellant’s sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentenc-ing. Compare Rivers v. State, 513 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hope v. State, 513 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 524 So. 2d 719, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1079, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1988 WL 43400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
524 So. 2d 719 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hope v. State
513 So. 2d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Rivers v. State
513 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)