Taylor v. State

502 So. 2d 1324, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 634, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 773
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1341·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the recommended guidelines range in sentencing Joseph Taylor following the revocation of his probation in a criminal case because “the guidelines sentence is not long enough to allow for the necessary drug and psychological treatment that is being given to him as a youthful offender”.

While we understand and applaud what the trial court was trying to accomplish, namely, a cure for Taylor’s drug addiction, such stated reason for departure was not clear and convincing, that being the required standard. Vickers v. State, 490 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

We reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines upon authority of Young v. State, 455 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), approved, 476 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1985); Vance v. State, 475 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); and Vickers.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 502 So. 2d 1324, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 634, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 1324 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Young
476 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Young v. State
455 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Vance v. State
475 So. 2d 1362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Vickers v. State
490 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)