Taylor v. State

502 So. 2d 24, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 176, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1986·No. No. 86-740·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is reversible error-to impose a departure sentence under the sentencing guidelines without an accompanying written statement delineating reasons for the departure. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)ll.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Also, the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1985), may not be used as a basis for a departure sentence. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863, (Fla.1986); Vicknair v. State, 483 So.2d 896 (Fla. 5th DCA), aff'd, 498 So.2d 416 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand this case for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 502 So. 2d 24, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 176, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

502 So. 2d 24 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
518 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)