Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

407 So. 2d 356, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21908
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 386 So. 2d 825 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1981·No. No. 81-2004·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reviewof an order of the Polk County Circuit Court which summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Issues which were or could have been raised on a direct appeal are not cognizable grounds for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Hargrave v. State, 396 So.2d 1127 (Fla.1981); Owens v. State, 397 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Although appellant makes a bald assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel, he does not provide this court with the specific facts necessary to support such an [357]*357assertion as required by Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).

AFFIRMED.

SCHEB, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 407 So. 2d 356, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

407 So. 2d 356 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
394 So. 2d 997 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Hargrave v. State
396 So. 2d 1127 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Owens v. State
397 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)