Hargrave v. State

396 So. 2d 1127
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 1981
Docket59731
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 396 So. 2d 1127 (Hargrave v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hargrave v. State, 396 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 1981).

Opinion

396 So.2d 1127 (1981)

Lenson A. HARGRAVE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellees.

No. 59731.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 2, 1981.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Karen M. Gottlieb, Beth C. Weitzner and Robert R. Schrank, Asst. Public Defenders, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lenson A. Hargrave brings this appeal to review the trial court's denial of his motion to vacate sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant was sentenced to death for first-degree murder on July 18, 1975. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. Hargrave v. State, 366 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 919, 100 S.Ct. 239, 62 L.Ed.2d 176 (1979).

Hargrave filed his 3.850 motion to vacate and a motion for stay of execution on September 19, 1980. The trial court denied both motions ore tenus on September 26, 1980, followed by a written order filed on October 10, 1980. The 3.850 motion asserts a multitude of grounds for relief, from constitutional and non-constitutional error in the guilt phase of the trial to alleged fundamental defects in the sentencing process.[*] The trial court found, and we so hold, that the issues raised by appellant either were or could have been raised on direct appeal, or they involve changes in decisional law not *1128 cognizable in a 3.850 motion. See Adams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1980); Sullivan v. State, 372 So.2d 938 (Fla. 1979); Spenkelink v. State, 350 So.2d 85 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 960, 98 S.Ct. 492, 54 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977); State v. Matera, 266 So.2d 661 (Fla. 1972); Witt v. State, 387 So.2d 922 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 796, 66 L.Ed.2d 612.

Accordingly, the order of the trial court denying 3.850 relief is affirmed, and the motion for stay of execution pending disposition of this appeal is denied.

SUNDBERG, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[*] On September 23, 1980, Hargrave brought a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel due to to counsel's failure to raise two issues on direct appeal. We denied the petition on September 24, 1980. Hargrave v. Wainwright, 388 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobbert v. Wainwright
593 F. Supp. 1418 (M.D. Florida, 1984)
Douglas v. Wainwright
714 F.2d 1532 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Brown v. State
439 So. 2d 872 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Cooper v. State
437 So. 2d 1070 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Hargrave v. State
427 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Suto v. State
422 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Watkins v. State
413 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Ford v. Strickland
676 F.2d 434 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Taylor v. State
407 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Ford v. State
407 So. 2d 907 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Smith v. State
400 So. 2d 956 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Washington v. State
397 So. 2d 285 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 So. 2d 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargrave-v-state-fla-1981.