Taylor v. State

407 So. 2d 353, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 386 So. 2d 825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1981·No. No. 81-504·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence of the trial court. However, an indigent person’s probation cannot be revoked for failure to pay supervisory fees unless there is a positive finding that the defendant was financially able to make such payments. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

We therefore strike that portion of the order regarding appellant’s violation of the condition which required supervisory fee payments. As amended, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 407 So. 2d 353, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21906 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

407 So. 2d 353 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coxon v. State
365 So. 2d 1067 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)