Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad
This text of 203 N.W. 434 (Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover loss sustained on a carload of apples, by reason of a decline in the market, at Kenyon, this state, during the time the same was unreasonably delayed in transit. The cause was tried and submitted to the court for decision. Findings of fact and conclusions were made and filed in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for amended findings, which motion was denied. From the order denying such motion, defendant attempted to appeal.
No extended remarks are necessary in disposing of the matter. We again call attention to the rule that an order, denying a motion for amended findings, is not appealable. Lamprey v. St. P. & C. Ry. Co. 86 Minn. 509, 91 N. W. 29; Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth, 108 Minn. 83, 121 N. W. 212; Desaman v. Butler Bros. 118 Minn. 198, 136 N. W. 748; Rees v. Nash, 142 Minn. 260, 171 N. W. 781; Nash v. Kirchoff, 161 Minn. 409, 201 N. W. 617.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 N.W. 434, 163 Minn. 46, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-chicago-great-western-railroad-minn-1925.