Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

203 N.W. 434, 163 Minn. 46, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1190
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 17, 1925·No. No. 24,652.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Quinn, J.

Action to recover loss sustained on a carload of apples, by reason of a decline in the market, at Kenyon, this state, during the time the same was unreasonably delayed in transit. The cause was tried and submitted to the court for decision. Findings of fact and conclusions were made and filed in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for amended findings, which motion was denied. From the order denying such motion, defendant attempted to appeal.

No extended remarks are necessary in disposing of the matter. We again call attention to the rule that an order, denying a motion for amended findings, is not appealable. Lamprey v. St. P. & C. Ry. Co. 86 Minn. 509, 91 N. W. 29; Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth, 108 Minn. 83, 121 N. W. 212; Desaman v. Butler Bros. 118 Minn. 198, 136 N. W. 748; Rees v. Nash, 142 Minn. 260, 171 N. W. 781; Nash v. Kirchoff, 161 Minn. 409, 201 N. W. 617.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad, 203 N.W. 434, 163 Minn. 46, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1190 (Mich. 1925).

203 N.W. 434 (Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers State Bank v. Anderson
263 N.W. 443 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner
241 N.W. 569 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1932)