Tanner v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tanner v. State

111 So. 647, 22 Ala. App. 20, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 3

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 18, 1927

Docket6 Div. 897.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 So. 647 (Tanner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tanner v. State, 111 So. 647, 22 Ala. App. 20, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 3 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing-prohibited liquors.

' The evidence made a case proper to be submitted to a jury. Robert Cleckler v. State, ante, p. 17, 112 So. 185.

No exception to the ruling on the defendant’s motion for a new trial is shown by the bill of exceptions, and the same will not be considered. Ex parte Thomas, 207 Ala. 662, 93 So. 521.

The exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony have each been examined, and in none of the rulings-complained of do we find error. Only the simplest of legal principles were involved, and we deem it unnecessary to discuss the rulings seriatim.

There is no error in the record, ‘and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI