Cleckler v. State
This text of 112 So. 185 (Cleckler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
According to the law as it has been made by the prohibition statutes and the decisions of this court, we state the following two principles:
(1) Any act performed with or upon any part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky may be considered an act of dominion over same, from which the jury may infer the defendant’s possession of such part. ■ ■
(2) The possession of any ■ part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky is a fact from which the jury is authorized to infer the possession of- a complete still of such kind.
Measuring the case before / us by these principles, and without discussing the evidence, the appellant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge requested by him.
Judgment .affirmed.
Affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 185, 22 Ala. App. 17, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleckler-v-state-alactapp-1926.