Cleckler v. State

112 So. 185, 22 Ala. App. 17, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 10
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1926
Docket5 Div. 637.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 112 So. 185 (Cleckler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleckler v. State, 112 So. 185, 22 Ala. App. 17, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

RICE, J.

According to the law as it has been made by the prohibition statutes and the decisions of this court, we state the following two principles:

(1) Any act performed with or upon any part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky may be considered an act of dominion over same, from which the jury may infer the defendant’s possession of such part. ■ ■

(2) The possession of any ■ part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky is a fact from which the jury is authorized to infer the possession of- a complete still of such kind.

Measuring the case before / us by these principles, and without discussing the evidence, the appellant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge requested by him.

Judgment .affirmed.

Affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cone
276 P. 541 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)
Cleckler v. State
112 So. 186 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Tanner v. State
111 So. 647 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 185, 22 Ala. App. 17, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleckler-v-state-alactapp-1926.