Cleckler v. State
Opinion
According to the law as it has been made by the prohibition statutes and the decisions of this court, we state the following two principles:
(1) Any act performed with or upon any part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky may be considered an act of dominion over same, from which the jury may infer the defendant’s possession of such part. ■ ■
(2) The possession of any ■ part of a still suitable to be used for making whisky is a fact from which the jury is authorized to infer the possession of- a complete still of such kind.
Measuring the case before / us by these principles, and without discussing the evidence, the appellant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge requested by him.
Judgment .affirmed.
Affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
112 So. 185 (Cleckler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.