Johnson v. State

132 So. 69, 24 Ala. App. 178, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 186
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 20, 1931
Docket3 Div. 665, 666.
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 69 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 132 So. 69, 24 Ala. App. 178, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 186 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

RICE, J.

These two cases were tried together, by agreement, both appellants convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by having whisky in their possession, and the separate appeals of each submitted here on the same transcript.

The bill of exceptions not showing an exception to have been reserved to the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, said action cannot be here reviewed. Tanner v. State, 22 Ala. App. 20, 111 So. 647.

The record presents nothing else worthy of mention by us, and the judgments of conviction are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tanner v. State
111 So. 647 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 69, 24 Ala. App. 178, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-alactapp-1931.