Johnson v. State
This text of 132 So. 69 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These two cases were tried together, by agreement, both appellants convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by having whisky in their possession, and the separate appeals of each submitted here on the same transcript.
The bill of exceptions not showing an exception to have been reserved to the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, said action cannot be here reviewed. Tanner v. State, 22 Ala. App. 20, 111 So. 647.
The record presents nothing else worthy of mention by us, and the judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 So. 69, 24 Ala. App. 178, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-alactapp-1931.