Talbot v. Scripps

Michigan Supreme Court

Talbot v. Scripps

31 Mich. 268, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 58

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 29, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by18 cases

This text of 31 Mich. 268 (Talbot v. Scripps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talbot v. Scripps, 31 Mich. 268, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 58 (Mich. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooley, J.

This is an action by a stockholder in a printing and publishing corporation against two persons who are alleged to have conspired with two "of the directors of the corporation to suspend and destroy the business and franchises of the company, and to have induced such directors to suspend the publication of their daily and weekly newspapers for the benefit of a rival establishment, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s interest in the corporation worthless. The wrong alleged will be seen to be a corporate wrong, in which all the stockholders are proportionally interested, and any legal redress should be at the instance of the corporation, if the board of directors will consent to demand it. There is no allegation that the board has been requested to bring suit and has refused. Under these circumstances, we know of no ground on which the suit can be maintained.. As well might an individual stockholder bring suit to recover his share of corporate funds which had been lost by negligence or embezzlement, or his proportion of insurance money on the corporate property destroyed by fire. The injury counted on is not a separate injury to each of the stockholders, but a joint injury to all, and the corporation represents all for the purposes of legal remedy; at least until it is shown that the corporate authorities refuse after proper application to act.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Graves, Ch. J., and Campbell, J., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooley, J.

This is an action by a stockholder in a printing and publishing corporation against two persons who are alleged to have conspired with two "of the directors of the corporation to suspend and destroy the business and franchises of the company, and to have induced such directors to suspend the publication of their daily and weekly newspapers for the benefit of a rival establishment, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s interest in the corporation worthless. The wrong alleged will be seen to be a corporate wrong, in which all the stockholders are proportionally interested, and any legal redress should be at the instance of the corporation, if the board of directors will consent to demand it. There is no allegation that the board has been requested to bring suit and has refused. Under these circumstances, we know of no ground on which the suit can be maintained.. As well might an individual stockholder bring suit to recover his share of corporate funds which had been lost by negligence or embezzlement, or his proportion of insurance money on the corporate property destroyed by fire. The injury counted on is not a separate injury to each of the stockholders, but a joint injury to all, and the corporation represents all for the purposes of legal remedy; at least until it is shown that the corporate authorities refuse after proper application to act.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Graves, Ch. J., and Campbell, J., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Mich. 268, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talbot-v-scripps-mich-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack