Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.

Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.

763 A.2d 1044, 255 Conn. 916, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 26, 2000·No. SC 16241; SC 16242·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

The motion of the named defendant, filed February 22, 2000, to dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal and to vacate the judgment of the Appellate Court; Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc., 55 Conn. App. 359, 742 A.2d 366 (1999); in which motion the defendant Putnam zoning commission joined, having been presented to the court, it is hereby ordered that the appeals are dismissed. The judgment of the Appellate Court is vacated and the appeals are remanded to that court with direction to dismiss the plaintiffs’ original appeal for lack of aggrievement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc., 763 A.2d 1044, 255 Conn. 916, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 454 (Colo. 2000).

763 A.2d 1044 (Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction
142 A.3d 290 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016)
Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.
3 A.3d 992 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
State v. Boyle
949 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
State v. Singleton
876 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Plemmons v. Newton, No. Fa 00 0557263 (Feb. 25, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2649 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
In Re Amber S., (June 4, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 7076 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)