Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 19, 2000
DocketSC 16241
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 744 A.2d 439 (Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc., 744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
763 A.2d 1044 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, No. Cv97-0056880s (Aug. 29, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10091 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taft-v-wheelabrator-putnam-inc-conn-2000.