Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc., 744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8 (Colo. 2000).
744 A.2d 439 (Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
763 A.2d 1044 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, No. Cv97-0056880s (Aug. 29, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10091 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)