Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.

744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 19, 2000·No. SC 16241·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[919]*919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16241. Sheila A. Huddleston, Joseph P. Williams and John E. Wertam, in support of the petition. Ernest J. Cotnoir, in opposition. Decided January 19, 2000
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc., 744 A.2d 439, 252 Conn. 918, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 8 (Colo. 2000).

744 A.2d 439 (Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
763 A.2d 1044 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, No. Cv97-0056880s (Aug. 29, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10091 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)