Taboada v. United States
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac anne KK DATE FILED:_06/23/2023 Ricardo Taboada, : Petitioner, : : 22-cv-8141 (LJL) -v- : 19-cr-117 (LJL) United States of America, : ORDER Respondent. :
we KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On May 23, 2023, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order (“Reconsideration Opinion”) denying the motion for reconsideration of Petitioner Ricardo Taboada (“Taboada”). Dkt. No. 9. This Order clarifies the Court’s Reconsideration Opinion. Because Taboada did not at that time make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Reconsideration Opinion would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) SO ORDERED. “ pet Dated: June 23, 2023 we MOE New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taboada v. United States (Taboada v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.