Swezey v. Montague Rehab & Pain Management, P.C.

304 A.D.2d 746, 757 N.Y.S.2d 763

This text of 304 A.D.2d 746 (Swezey v. Montague Rehab & Pain Management, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swezey v. Montague Rehab & Pain Management, P.C., 304 A.D.2d 746, 757 N.Y.S.2d 763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Choong Kim appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 5, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him without prejudice to renewal upon completion of discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal (see Swezey v Montague Rehab & Pain Mgt., 304 AD2d 746 [decided herewith]). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swezey v. Montague Rehab & Pain Management, P.C.
304 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 746, 757 N.Y.S.2d 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swezey-v-montague-rehab-pain-management-pc-nyappdiv-2003.