Hoxha v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoxha v. City of New York

265 A.D.2d 379, 696 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10250

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 9, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, since discovery has not been completed, granting summary judgment would be premature at this point (see, CPLR 3212 [f|). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 9, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, since discovery has not been completed, granting summary judgment would be premature at this point (see, CPLR 3212 [f|). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Hoxha v. City of New York, 265 A.D.2d 379, 696 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10250 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 379 (Hoxha v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related