Sweeting v. State
This text of 835 So. 2d 1279 (Sweeting v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vincent Sweeting seeks review of the trial court’s order, denying his motion to withdraw plea. The judge determined that it lacked jurisdiction in light of Sweet-ing’s pending direct appeal of the plea and sentence. See, e.g., Lowe v. State, 644 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2d. DCA 1994). We reverse and remand for further proceedings as this court had relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of ruling on the pending motion, though our review of the record reflects that the trial court had not yet received this court’s order when it denied relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
835 So. 2d 1279, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1126, 2003 WL 245229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeting-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.