Sweeting v. State

835 So. 2d 1279, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1126, 2003 WL 245229
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-4694
StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 1279 (Sweeting v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweeting v. State, 835 So. 2d 1279, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1126, 2003 WL 245229 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Sweeting seeks review of the trial court’s order, denying his motion to withdraw plea. The judge determined that it lacked jurisdiction in light of Sweet-ing’s pending direct appeal of the plea and sentence. See, e.g., Lowe v. State, 644 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2d. DCA 1994). We reverse and remand for further proceedings as this court had relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of ruling on the pending motion, though our review of the record reflects that the trial court had not yet received this court’s order when it denied relief.

WARNER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowe v. State
644 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 1279, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1126, 2003 WL 245229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeting-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.