Lowe v. State

644 So. 2d 510, 1994 WL 380924
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1994
Docket92-01897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 644 So. 2d 510 (Lowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowe v. State, 644 So. 2d 510, 1994 WL 380924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

644 So.2d 510 (1994)

Michael LOWE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-01897.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 22, 1994.

*511 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Michael Lowe, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ann P. Corcoran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, who was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses, appeals his adjudication as an adult and the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We affirm on these issues, but reverse for correction of the defendant's sentence.

The defendant was charged with, and pled guilty to, first degree felony murder, grand theft, and two counts of attempted armed robbery. The defendant contends that he was not properly adjudicated as an adult offender. Because the defendant was charged with a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment, however, he was correctly treated as an adult pursuant to section 39.022(5)(c)(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The trial court's ruling was correct because the motion was filed after the defendant had filed a notice of appeal and, thus, the trial court no longer had jurisdiction to consider the motion. See Harrell v. State, 197 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1967); Dailey v. State, 575 So.2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

For each of the two counts of attempted armed robbery, the defendant was sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment, with a three year minimum mandatory. The statutory maximum sentence for this crime is fifteen years' incarceration. See sections 774.04(4)(b) and 812.12(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). Accordingly, on remand the sentence should be corrected to reflect the statutory maximum. The trial court may again impose the three year minimum mandatory on each count.

The defendant's convictions are affirmed, but the cause is remanded for correction of the sentence.

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sweeting v. State
835 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Davis v. State
763 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 So. 2d 510, 1994 WL 380924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.