Sweeting v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sweeting v. State

900 So. 2d 780, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6637, 2005 WL 1047265

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2005·No. No. 5D05-983·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While it is difficult to tell from the petition filed with this court, it appears that the petitioner is seeking review of an order of the trial court denying his motion for a DNA evidence examination. The petition is, however, facially insufficient in that it fails to comply with the requirements of [781]*781Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3), and must, accordingly, be dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice so that the petitioner may attempt to file a facially sufficient petition.

DISMISSED.

SAWAYA, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While it is difficult to tell from the petition filed with this court, it appears that the petitioner is seeking review of an order of the trial court denying his motion for a DNA evidence examination. The petition is, however, facially insufficient in that it fails to comply with the requirements of [781]*781Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3), and must, accordingly, be dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice so that the petitioner may attempt to file a facially sufficient petition.

DISMISSED.

SAWAYA, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Sweeting v. State, 900 So. 2d 780, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6637, 2005 WL 1047265 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

900 So. 2d 780 (Sweeting v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.