Sutherland v. City of New York
This text of 488 N.E.2d 837 (Sutherland v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered *802 in the affirmative. We interpret the question certified as asking whether the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem. We conclude that it had that power, and pass on no other issue (Herrick v Second Cuthouse, 64 NY2d 692; Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judges Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 N.E.2d 837, 66 N.Y.2d 800, 497 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutherland-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1985.