Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sutherland v. City of New York

Sutherland v. City of New York

124 A.D.2d 503, 508 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sutherland v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 A.D.2d 568 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1986·Published

Opinion

The facts in this case are set forth in the opinion of this court (107 AD2d 568, affd 66 NY2d 800, 802, on the sole ground that "the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem.”).

Thereafter, it was contendéd at the Supreme Court by the defendants that the matter had been settled for the lump sum, but the court refused to approve a lump-sum settlement. We affirm solely on the basis that no binding settlement had been entered into among the parties. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutherland v. City of New York, 124 A.D.2d 503, 508 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 503 (Sutherland v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutherland v. City of New York
488 N.E.2d 837 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Sutherland v. City of New York
107 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)