Sutherland v. City of New York
This text of 124 A.D.2d 503 (Sutherland v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this case are set forth in the opinion of this court (107 AD2d 568, affd 66 NY2d 800, 802, on the sole ground that "the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem.”).
Thereafter, it was contendéd at the Supreme Court by the defendants that the matter had been settled for the lump sum, but the court refused to approve a lump-sum settlement. We affirm solely on the basis that no binding settlement had been entered into among the parties. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 503, 508 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutherland-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1986.