Sullivan v. State
967 So. 2d 274, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14680, 2007 WL 2733841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 So. 2d 762 →
Opinions
Appellant Quentin Sullivan appeals a circuit court order summarily denying his 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. Appellant alleges five claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm the trial court’s denial without comment, except to note that we reject appellant’s claim relating to a Richardson hearing because his allegations do not state a discovery violation needing a Richardson hearing, or that appellant suffered procedural prejudice. See Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sullivan v. State, 967 So. 2d 274, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14680, 2007 WL 2733841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
967 So. 2d 274 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Schopp
653 So. 2d 1016 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Collins v. State
671 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Thompson v. State
796 So. 2d 511 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Major v. State
979 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)