Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sullivan v. State

Sullivan v. State

972 So. 2d 918, 2007 WL 4270620
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2007·No. 2D06-5546·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

972 So.2d 918 (2007)

Willie SULLIVAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D06-5546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 5, 2007.

James. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Willie Sullivan challenges the trial court's decision allowing the State to have initial and rebuttal closing arguments in accordance with section 918.19, Florida Statutes (2006), and argues that section 918.19 is unconstitutional. We affirm based on the reasoning in Grice v. State, 967 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2007).

Affirmed.

WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., and LOGAN, PAUL E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. State, 972 So. 2d 918, 2007 WL 4270620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

972 So. 2d 918 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
976 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Sutton v. State
976 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Stuckey v. State
972 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)