Sullivan v. State

935 So. 2d 1235, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13413, 2006 WL 2347373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 So. 2d 762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 2006·No. No. 5D05-4141·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975) (for the proposition that when a trial court rules upon a motion for judgment of acquittal, all facts introduced into evidence are considered admitted, and the trial court must draw every conclusion and inference from them in favor of the State).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. State, 935 So. 2d 1235, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13413, 2006 WL 2347373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

935 So. 2d 1235 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Codie v. State
313 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)