Suckley v. Delafield
2 Cai. Cas. 222
Opinion
We are of opinion the reprefentation of failing in ballaft, was merely Hating the veffel would not be ex-pofed to the fea perils attending a loaded ihip. It was made in a time of profound peace, and in the prefent inftance, was fubftantially performed. We have no doubt on the condufl of the mailer. It was certainly barratry, and the plaintiff muft have judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suckley v. Delafield, 2 Cai. Cas. 222 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
2 Cai. Cas. 222 (Suckley v. Delafield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dole v. New England Mutual Marine Ins.
7 F. Cas. 837 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1864)
American Insurance v. Dunham & Wadsworth
15 Wend. 9 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1835)
Bulkley v. Protection Ins. Co.
4 F. Cas. 614 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1835)
American Insurance v. Dunham
12 Wend. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1834)
Jefferson Insurance v. H. & D. Cotheal.
7 Wend. 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1831)
Vandenheuvel v. United Insurance
2 Johns. Cas. 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)